Abstrak
<p><em>The urgency of this research is to examine the implementation of the Supreme of the Court Circular Number 3 2015 on the addition of livelihoods for children from 10% to 20% per year. Since the determination Supreme of the Court Circular in the Family Court of Sawahlunto, in 2018 were 7 decisions have been made, 3 to applicated and 4 doesn’t. </em><em>The inequality when considering the jury leads to three fundamental questions: What is the position of </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em> in the concept of the positivist legal philosophy? What are the Judges considerations to implementing and not implementing </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em>? Howabout the Islamic Law perspective to </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em> in terms of adding child livelihood? To answer the object of research, the implementation </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em> Family Court Sawahlunto is extensively examined as sociological/ empirical legal research. The results of this research philosophically </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em> is a harmonization between Islamic law and positive law, on the condition that </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em> offers the jury a guarantee of legal certainty when deciding on the addition of a child. Consideration of the jury in the implementation of </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em> to ensure that children's livelihoods are met in terms of economic needs that further improve and maintain descendant relationships for those who do not implement </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular </em><em>due to the limited ability of their fathers. </em><em>Supreme of the Court Circular</em><em>’s perspective on Islamic law regarding the addition of a child at 10% to 20% per year is relevant to the problem of the Maslahah Mursalah, which is to maintain hereditary relationships.</em><em></em></p>